[Florida Code Talk] Unsubscribe
Simon Barker
maintenanceguy at bellsouth.net
Thu Nov 6 08:25:27 EST 2008
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list
Thu Nov 6 08:25:27 EST 2008
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Someone please remove me from this list -- Simon J Barker The Maintenance Guy Tel 863 557 1058 Fax 407 854 5695 Assoc Member CFVRMA -------------- Original message from "Dennis Stanley" <tstanley at i-1.net>: -------------- > Here is a little history of existing building codes. I do not know if it > will aid in the discussion or not. > > http://www.huduser.org/publications/destech/narrp/toc_narrp.html > > http://www.huduser.org/publications/destech/smartcodes.html > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mark Cramer" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:00 PM > Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR > > > I agree with the reasoning, but is that what the code says? > > How about if the house is in a flood zone? Do we now throw perfect reasoning > out the window? > > Mark Cramer > > -----Original Message----- > From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com > [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Bob Koning > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:33 PM > To: Don Meyer; Eric Kuritzky > Cc: codetalk at myfloridacode.com > Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR > > This is perfect reasoning. I am impressed. Thank You. > > > R.J.Koning - Director > Contractors Institute > rjkoning at contractorsinstitute.com > 8301 Joliet Street > Hudson, Fl 34667 > 727-863-5147 > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com > [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Don Meyer > Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 5:26 PM > To: Eric Kuritzky > Cc: codetalk at myfloridacode.com > Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR > > An alteration is a decision you make to change your building. > > A fire is not a decision, it is an unfortunate event or accident. > > If the house had never burned, the owner would not be in the building > department getting a permit to replace trusses. > Without a fire, the house could last another sixty years and no one > would have a problem. Since it did have a fire and if it is repaired > with original material and lasted sixty years you get the same results. > > It is not making the house any less safe than it would have been before > the fire. On that basis it could be classified a repair. > > However, if I am spending money to fix my house I would want it to be > compliant and with the efficiencies of the current building codes. > > Don Meyer, Architect > Coral Springs, FL > > > Eric Kuritzky wrote: > > If the roof has to be completely replaced, and I'm guessing most of > the > > interior walls, HVAC, electric and plumbing...then this wasn't a > simple > > 'damaged' building. > > > > Everyone seems to be trying to avoid the hard decision here, which is > that > > all the new work, which is just about everything, should be brought up > to > > existing code. > > > > Hell, we demand more code compliance from minor changes of tenant use, > a > > simple house addition, or simply installing new windows (which, if I > recall, > > must all bear product approval information and installation > compliance). > > Look at the requirements for installing a re-roof...it exceeds the > original > > roof requirements. > > > > If this house was sixty years old and had fabric covered electrical > wires, > > would you allow them to replace the electric similarly? With fuses > instead > > of circuit breakers? > > > > Repairing damage would be to me 'localized' damage, not the whole > blasted > > roof. Maybe part of the roof, or just the kitchen, but not > everything. > > > > If the HVAC needs to be replaced, would you permit an SEER of less > than 10, > > which might have been high when the home was built, if it had a SEER > rating > > at all. Would you allow less insulation than the code now requires, > say, > > R-6 in the attic and nothing in the walls? > > > > Do you realize the precedent this can set? > > > > Eric D. Kuritzky, Architect, CBO > > Orlando > > > > > > > > > > On 11/5/08 4:53 PM, "Bob Koning" wrote: > > > > > >> I agree Christopher, but if understand this situation the building > was > >> "damaged" by a fire. > >> > >> > >> R.J.Koning - Director > >> Contractors Institute > >> rjkoning at contractorsinstitute.com > >> 8301 Joliet Street > >> Hudson, Fl 34667 > >> 727-863-5147 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com > >> [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Christopher > >> Banbury > >> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:16 PM > >> To: codetalk at myfloridacode.com > >> Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR > >> > >> I understand that BOs are routinely pressed right to the bleeding > edge > >> of code application. I can just see somebody coming in for a permit > >> whose house has been completely blown away by a tornado, foundation > and > >> all, and asking to build the same house back as a repair. What could > you > >> say? They say they want to build the same house back again. > >> > >> > >> > >> In my opinion, neither the intuitive nor the code definition of > 'repair' > >> covers a scenario where entire systems are missing so that their > >> original configuration cannot be deduced. Repair speaks more toward > >> replacement of damaged elements. At some point the BO has to make a > >> decision as to whether there is enough of the damaged structure > >> remaining to determine what the pre-existing condition actually was. > If > >> an entire roof system and walls are missing and the applicant cannot > >> demonstrate what was there previously by photos or plans then calling > it > >> a repair is just an invitation for wholesale alteration. > >> > >> > >> > >> Christopher Banbury, PE > >> > >> President > >> > >> > >> > >> Ark Engineering, Inc. > >> > >> PO Box 10129, Brooksville, FL 34603 > >> > >> 22 North Broad ST, Brooksville, FL 34601 > >> > >> Phone: (352) 754-2424 > >> > >> Fax: (352) 754-2412 > >> > >> www.arkengineering.net > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> An HTML attachment was scrubbed... > >> URL: > >> > http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20081105/0b6b276 > >> 0/attachment.html > >> -------------- next part -------------- > >> A non-text attachment was scrubbed... > >> Name: not available > >> Type: image/gif > >> Size: 3015 bytes > >> Desc: image001.gif > >> Url : > >> > http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20081105/0b6b276 > >> 0/attachment.gif > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CodeTalk mailing list > >> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > >> Unsubscribe or change your options at: > >> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> CodeTalk mailing list > >> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > >> Unsubscribe or change your options at: > >> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk > >> > > > > > > Eric D. Kuritzky, Architect, CBO > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > CodeTalk mailing list > > CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > > Unsubscribe or change your options at: > > http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk > > > > > _______________________________________________ > CodeTalk mailing list > CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at: > http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk > > _______________________________________________ > CodeTalk mailing list > CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at: > http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk > > _______________________________________________ > CodeTalk mailing list > CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at: > http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk > > _______________________________________________ > CodeTalk mailing list > CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > Unsubscribe or change your options at: > http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20081106/3d8ce91f/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] work area for fire damaged SFR
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list