MyFloridaCode.com

Hi Guys:
 
I would think this can be changed by legislature, Get hold of your reps and 
 have them put in a bill to stop this nonsense... If they can't get the 
Codebook  right, then revert back to the old edition until , the new one is  
correct... I am absolutely for it , as probably is every designer,  GC, Plan 
Reviewer,  and BO out there. 
 
Tom Ricci
BT Builders Inc
954-214-4448
 
 
In a message dated 12/1/2009 11:37:39 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,  
chandlerknowles at att.net writes:

Yes indeed!
 
Sometimes it seems some sort of game to submit plans, wait days or weeks  
for them, only to find through rejection that there is a change in an unknown 
 or obscure Code that requires changes and resubmission.  That statement  
applies to policies of individual inspection departments too.
 
Chandler Knowles, Designer-Builder
Pensacola
 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _Glen  Mast_ (mailto:glenmast at comcast.net)  
To: _Rob  Harrell_ (mailto:rharrell1 at cfl.rr.com)  ; _BOAF Discussion Group_ 
(mailto:boafdiscussion at boaf.net)  ; _CodeTalk_ 
(mailto:codetalk at myfloridacode.com)  
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 10:19  PM
Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] FW:  2009 Replacement Pages to the 2007 
FBCareavailable for review



I'm thinking of talking to my state represenative  about sponsoring a bill 
that says that code changes including  supplements can not go into effect 
until thirty days AFTER they are  available in both written and electronic 
versions.  This business of  not having the codes in a decent format until 60 
to 90 days after they go  into effect is ridiculous!  Make that 90 to 180 
days for the CD  versions!  I know it's bad for the building department 
personnel but  it's even worse for us designers as we are often working on jobs 2 
to 3  months prior to permitting.
 
Anyone else with me?
 
glen mast
MAST DRAFTING and DESIGN


----- Original Message ----- 
From:  _Rob Harrell_ (mailto:rharrell1 at cfl.rr.com)  
To: _BOAF Discussion Group_ (mailto:boafdiscussion at boaf.net)  ; _CodeTalk_ 
(mailto:codetalk at myfloridacode.com)  
Sent: Tuesday, December 01, 2009 8:25  PM
Subject: [Florida Code Talk] FW: 2009  Replacement Pages to the 2007 FBC 
areavailable for review




-----Original Message-----
From: Florida  Building Code [mailto:codes at floridabuilding.org] 
Sent: Tuesday,  December 01, 2009 5:20 PM
Subject: 2009 Replacement Pages to the  2007 FBC are available for review



To All Interested  Parties: 
This is to advise  you know, that the 2009 Replacement Pages (Errata) to 
the 2007  Florida Building Code are now  available for review.  Please  use 
the following link to view the documents: 
_http://www.ecodes.biz/ecodes_support/Free_Resources/Florida_Codes/2007_Flor
ida_Errata/FL_07_Errata_main.html_ 
(http://www.ecodes.biz/ecodes_support/Free_Resources/Florida_Codes/2007_Florida_Errata/FL_07_Errata_main.html)   
Thank  you, 
Florida Department of  Community Affairs 
Building Codes and  Standards Office
 
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
CodeTalk mailing  list
CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email to  codetalk-unsubscribe at myfloridacode.com
or
Unsubscribe or change your  options  at:
http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk

 
____________________________________
_______________________________________________
CodeTalk mailing  list
CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email to  codetalk-unsubscribe at myfloridacode.com
or
Unsubscribe or change your  options  at:
http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk



_______________________________________________
CodeTalk  mailing list
CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email  to codetalk-unsubscribe at myfloridacode.com
or
Unsubscribe or change your  options  at:
http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk




-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20091202/084d1f27/attachment.html