MyFloridaCode.com

Jon
got your email. Howerver, there is nothing I can do about your subscription. 
Also, this is the only mail I have ever sent you. Try barking up another 
tree
.
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jon Cole" <joncole999 at cfl.rr.com>
To: "'Bryan Holland'" <bholland at cityofnorthport.com>; "'Building Officials 
Association of Florida,Inc.'" <boafdiscussion at boaf.net>; 
<codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com>; <codetalk at myfloridacode.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:21 PM
Subject: [Florida Code Talk] REMOVAL REQUEST


>
> Well, I have tried to unsubscribe from these emails 4 times during the 
> past
> 2 months by following the procedure at the bottom of the screen, but I 
> still
> get 10-15 emails a day from this forum...
>
> I'm going to try doing a reply to all from every email I get and see if
> someone there will get sick of it and actually remove me from the
> distribution list as I've requested.
>
> jc.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
> [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Bryan Holland
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:27 AM
> To: Building Officials Association of Florida, Inc.;
> codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com; codetalk at myfloridacode.com
> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [Florida Code Talk] Rule 9B - 3.047, GFCI
> Protection
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> According to Rule 9B - 3.047, Section 2705.1 of the FBC and E3304.1 of
> the FBC-R will be amended to include to language found in Section
> 680.22(B) of the 2008 NEC which requires GFCI protection of both direct
> connected (hard-wired) and cord-and-plug connected pool pump motors.
>
>
>
> However, there will also be an Exception for one-and two-family
> dwellings.  This exception is NOT found in the NEC.
>
>
>
> As indicated in the IAEI Analysis of Changes, Proposal 17-85 was
> rejected which suggested this rule be placed back into the NEC as it was
> in the 1999 edition.  It was looked at again by CMP-17 after a review of
> data provided from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, National
> Injury Information Clearinghouse.  (See Comment 17-75 of the NFPA-70,
> 2007 Record of Comments.)
>
>
>
> I can and have supported making amendments to the NEC when the code is
> made stronger and provides better protection to people and property, but
> can't understand why or how the Florida Building Commission is in a
> position to reduce what is established as the minimum provisions by a
> consensus process.
>
>
>
> For example, the requirement for bonding metal studs in buildings and
> structures enhanced the NEC requirements without creating a significant
> burden to builders and contractors.  This new rule reduces the minimum
> provisions for safety of a nationally recognized standard with no real
> substantiation provided for creating the Exception.
>
>
>
> I hope you all can take some time to review this matter and forward your
> comments and opinions to the Florida Building Commission.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bryan P. Holland
>
> City of North Port
>
> 4970 City Hall Blvd.
>
> North Port, FL 34286
>
> (941) 429-7053
>
> bholland at cityofnorthport.com
>
> www.iaeifl.org <http://www.iaeifl.org>
>
> www.boaf.net
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20090527/5f2ddda8/at
> tachment.html
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
>