MyFloridaCode.com

Just a quickie...........How is that this guy JC is recieving 10-15 emails a 
day from code talk ??  I know I AM NOT RECIEVING THEM......
Hope all is well with you all and that work is picking up ???
Diva




> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:21 PM
> Subject: [Florida Code Talk] REMOVAL REQUEST
>
>
>>
>> Well, I have tried to unsubscribe from these emails 4 times during the
>> past
>> 2 months by following the procedure at the bottom of the screen, but I
>> still
>> get 10-15 emails a day from this forum...
>>
>> I'm going to try doing a reply to all from every email I get and see if
>> someone there will get sick of it and actually remove me from the
>> distribution list as I've requested.
>>
>> jc.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
>> [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Bryan Holland
>> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:27 AM
>> To: Building Officials Association of Florida, Inc.;
>> codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com; codetalk at myfloridacode.com
>> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [Florida Code Talk] Rule 9B - 3.047, GFCI
>> Protection
>>
>> Hello All,
>>
>>
>>
>> According to Rule 9B - 3.047, Section 2705.1 of the FBC and E3304.1 of
>> the FBC-R will be amended to include to language found in Section
>> 680.22(B) of the 2008 NEC which requires GFCI protection of both direct
>> connected (hard-wired) and cord-and-plug connected pool pump motors.
>>
>>
>>
>> However, there will also be an Exception for one-and two-family
>> dwellings.  This exception is NOT found in the NEC.
>>
>>
>>
>> As indicated in the IAEI Analysis of Changes, Proposal 17-85 was
>> rejected which suggested this rule be placed back into the NEC as it was
>> in the 1999 edition.  It was looked at again by CMP-17 after a review of
>> data provided from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, National
>> Injury Information Clearinghouse.  (See Comment 17-75 of the NFPA-70,
>> 2007 Record of Comments.)
>>
>>
>>
>> I can and have supported making amendments to the NEC when the code is
>> made stronger and provides better protection to people and property, but
>> can't understand why or how the Florida Building Commission is in a
>> position to reduce what is established as the minimum provisions by a
>> consensus process.
>>
>>
>>
>> For example, the requirement for bonding metal studs in buildings and
>> structures enhanced the NEC requirements without creating a significant
>> burden to builders and contractors.  This new rule reduces the minimum
>> provisions for safety of a nationally recognized standard with no real
>> substantiation provided for creating the Exception.
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope you all can take some time to review this matter and forward your
>> comments and opinions to the Florida Building Commission.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Bryan P. Holland
>>
>> City of North Port
>>
>> 4970 City Hall Blvd.
>>
>> North Port, FL 34286
>>
>> (941) 429-7053
>>
>> bholland at cityofnorthport.com
>>
>> www.iaeifl.org <http://www.iaeifl.org>
>>
>> www.boaf.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------- next part --------------
>> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
>> URL:
>> http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20090527/5f2ddda8/at
>> tachment.html
>> _______________________________________________
>> CodeTalk mailing list
>> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
>> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CodeTalk mailing list
>> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
>> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
>> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk