MyFloridaCode.com

Simple suggestion until.....try the "delete" button, all of about 1/100000
of a second. You spend more time writing to bitch.

-----Original Message-----
From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
[mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Chad Palmer
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 10:49 PM
To: 'Davidson, Lesley'; 'Craig Tewksbury'; 'Jon Cole'; 'Bryan Holland';
'Building Officials Association of Florida, Inc.';
codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com; codetalk at myfloridacode.com
Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] REMOVAL REQUEST

Good man!!!!!!!!!!!! I like the way you think.........

-----Original Message-----
From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
[mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Davidson, Lesley
Sent: Thursday, June 25, 2009 11:27 AM
To: Craig Tewksbury; Jon Cole; Bryan Holland; Building Officials Association
of Florida,Inc.; codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com;
codetalk at myfloridacode.com
Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] REMOVAL REQUEST

I too have tried to unsubscribe...can someone please fix codetalk? 


Lesley J. Davidson, P.E.
Senior Project Manager
Better Jacksonville Plan

-----Original Message-----
From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
[mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Craig Tewksbury
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2009 10:17 PM
To: Jon Cole; 'Bryan Holland'; 'Building Officials Association of
Florida,Inc.'; codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com;
codetalk at myfloridacode.com
Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] REMOVAL REQUEST

Jon
got your email. Howerver, there is nothing I can do about your
subscription. 
Also, this is the only mail I have ever sent you. Try barking up another
tree .
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jon Cole" <joncole999 at cfl.rr.com>
To: "'Bryan Holland'" <bholland at cityofnorthport.com>; "'Building
Officials Association of Florida,Inc.'" <boafdiscussion at boaf.net>;
<codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com>; <codetalk at myfloridacode.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 12:21 PM
Subject: [Florida Code Talk] REMOVAL REQUEST


>
> Well, I have tried to unsubscribe from these emails 4 times during the

> past
> 2 months by following the procedure at the bottom of the screen, but I

> still get 10-15 emails a day from this forum...
>
> I'm going to try doing a reply to all from every email I get and see 
> if someone there will get sick of it and actually remove me from the 
> distribution list as I've requested.
>
> jc.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
> [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Bryan Holland
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2009 7:27 AM
> To: Building Officials Association of Florida, Inc.; 
> codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com; codetalk at myfloridacode.com
> Subject: [Norton AntiSpam] [Florida Code Talk] Rule 9B - 3.047, GFCI 
> Protection
>
> Hello All,
>
>
>
> According to Rule 9B - 3.047, Section 2705.1 of the FBC and E3304.1 of

> the FBC-R will be amended to include to language found in Section
> 680.22(B) of the 2008 NEC which requires GFCI protection of both 
> direct connected (hard-wired) and cord-and-plug connected pool pump
motors.
>
>
>
> However, there will also be an Exception for one-and two-family 
> dwellings.  This exception is NOT found in the NEC.
>
>
>
> As indicated in the IAEI Analysis of Changes, Proposal 17-85 was 
> rejected which suggested this rule be placed back into the NEC as it 
> was in the 1999 edition.  It was looked at again by CMP-17 after a 
> review of data provided from the Consumer Product Safety Commission, 
> National Injury Information Clearinghouse.  (See Comment 17-75 of the 
> NFPA-70,
> 2007 Record of Comments.)
>
>
>
> I can and have supported making amendments to the NEC when the code is

> made stronger and provides better protection to people and property, 
> but can't understand why or how the Florida Building Commission is in 
> a position to reduce what is established as the minimum provisions by 
> a consensus process.
>
>
>
> For example, the requirement for bonding metal studs in buildings and 
> structures enhanced the NEC requirements without creating a 
> significant burden to builders and contractors.  This new rule reduces

> the minimum provisions for safety of a nationally recognized standard 
> with no real substantiation provided for creating the Exception.
>
>
>
> I hope you all can take some time to review this matter and forward 
> your comments and opinions to the Florida Building Commission.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Bryan P. Holland
>
> City of North Port
>
> 4970 City Hall Blvd.
>
> North Port, FL 34286
>
> (941) 429-7053
>
> bholland at cityofnorthport.com
>
> www.iaeifl.org <http://www.iaeifl.org>
>
> www.boaf.net
>
>
>
>
>
> -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was 
> scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20090527/5f2dd
> da8/at
> tachment.html
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
> 

_______________________________________________
CodeTalk mailing list
CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk

_______________________________________________
CodeTalk mailing list
CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
Unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk


_______________________________________________
CodeTalk mailing list
CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
Unsubscribe by sending an email to codetalk-unsubscribe at myfloridacode.com
or
Unsubscribe or change your options at:
http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk