MyFloridaCode.com

[Florida Code Talk] Questionable call by Building official
Dennis Stanley dstanley at co.bay.fl.us
Thu May 21 09:07:49 EDT 2009


I do not know the entire situation, however I have seen an informal
interpretation of the hatch question.  Maybe this is what the inspector is
trying to accomplish:
http://www.boaf.net/pdf/I-List/3967.pdf


Jay Coughlin wrote:

> This is typical of some rouge inspectors. Call the CBO and it goes away
> if not in book, can be resolved in one day normally.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
> [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of FineR at gtlaw.com
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2009 7:55 PM
> To: noleball at hotmail.com; codetalk at myfloridacode.com
> Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] Questionable call by Building official
>
> (This is not intended to be legal advice)
>
> If it were me, and my county had a board of rules and appeals, I would
> file an appeal.  In my experience, the filing of an appeal is enough to
> lead to a discussion that frequently resolves the matter without the
> hearing being necessary.  And if it doesn't get resolved, you have a set
> date by which the matter will be resolved.    If your county does not
> have such a board, you can use the binding interpretation process in Fla
> Stat 553.775 which is very fast.
>
> Good luck
>
> Robert
>
> Robert S. Fine, Esq., AIA
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>     Tax Advice Disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements
> imposed by the IRS under Circular 230, we inform you that any U.S.
> federal tax advice contained in this communication (including any
> attachments), unless otherwise specifically stated, was not intended or
> written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (1) avoiding
> penalties under the Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting, marketing or
> recommending to another party any matters addressed herein.
>
>     The information contained in this transmission may contain
> privileged and confidential information. It is intended only for the use
> of the person(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient, you
> are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or
> duplication of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and
> destroy all copies of the original message. To reply to our email
> administrator directly, please send an email to
> mailto:postmaster at gtlaw.com.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
>
> From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com
> <codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com>
> To: codetalk at myfloridacode.com <codetalk at myfloridacode.com>
> Sent: Wed May 20 19:35:05 2009
> Subject: [Florida Code Talk] Questionable call by Building official
>
> I am trying to obtain a C.O. for a residence we have completed and the
> building official has taken some liberties with his judgement.  I
> usually try to do what is asked of me by the building officials as I
> will likely be one one day but this one is taking it a bit far.
>
>
>
> We have installed an attic ladder (aluminum ladder) in the garage and
> the inspector refuses to issue a C.O. until the attic ladder and hatch
> is painted with fire resistant paint.  Further, he insists that we
> install GFCI receptacles in the dining room (not kitchen) which is not
> required by the N.E.C. or the Florida Building Code.  I took the book to
> him and asked for him to show it to me and he said that it is not in the
> Code but it is in "his code" and it is what he wants to see.  He insists
> that the house will not pass until the hatch is painted with fire
> retardant paint and the recepatcles in the dining room (not kitchen) are
> changed.
>
>
>
> To make matters worse, he is the electrical inpector for the
> jurisdiction and is not licensed to do any other inspections.  Does
> anyone have any suggestions on this one?  Soem of you are building
> officials on here and may be able to help me out.
>
>
>
> Charles Walker
>
> CW Building Contractor, inc
>
> CBC 1250992  CCC 1325996 CFC 1427782
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live(tm): Keep your life in sync.
> http://windowslive.com/explore?ocid=TXT_TAGLM_BR_life_in_synch_052009
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20090520/781efbc
> 2/attachment.html
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
>
> _______________________________________________
> CodeTalk mailing list
> CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com
> Unsubscribe or change your options at:
> http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk




Please Note: "Florida has a very broad Public Records Law. Most
written communications to or from State and Local Officials regarding
State or Local business are public records available to the public and
media upon request. Your email communications may therefore be subject
to public disclosure.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: dstanley.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 297 bytes
Desc: Card for Dennis Stanley
Url : http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20090521/091b1727/attachment.vcf 



More information about the CodeTalk mailing list
| Home | Contractors Institute | Building Official | CI Certified | About Us | Contact Us |
| ©Copyright 2005 Contractors Institute     All rights reserved |