[Florida Code Talk] Design by Contractor
Eric Kuritzky
kuritzky at bellsouth.net
Wed Apr 14 14:47:12 EDT 2010
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list
Wed Apr 14 14:47:12 EDT 2010
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] Design by Contractor
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] Design by Contractor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Unfortunately, true. However, architects are regulated and can be punished for failing to comply with their licensing requirements. Less than knowledgeable designers just hurt the public. And the homes get sold and resold to unsuspecting purchasers. The licensure, just like building officials and building inspectors and contractors, is there to protect the public. And generally, it works to improve the process. From: Chandler Knowles <chandlerknowles at att.net> Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 18:30:36 +0000 To: <codetalk at myfloridacode.com> Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] Design by Contractor I submit that the problem is knowledge of the codes, not registration. I have worked with many architects and engineers that do not know the Codes as well as I do (a humble designer). I am a semi-retired designer-builder with 40 years in construction. In my experience, ignorance of Codes (minimums) and construction technique is just as prevalent with most registered and unregistered designers. The effect is worse with the registered guys, though, because expectations are higher. The FBC is available free online and a personal copy is readily available for purchase. Reading it is another matter. Now, continuing education is a good idea for everybody. Most architects think residential design is beneath them and make no effort to learn the unique aspects such as details of wood frame construction. The element in the production process that carries the poor plans (if anything does) is the skill and quality of the builder. Respectfully submitted. -- Chandler Knowles Pensacola, FL > -------------- Original message from Eric Kuritzky <kuritzky at bellsouth.net>: > -------------- > > And this is why the code should not exempt residential construction from being > designed by architect/engineers. You get people who are unfamiliar with, not > current with, the codes. And doing the construction on top of it. > > Homes. It¹s where people live, sleep, and raise their children. Don¹t you > think that this type of construction deserves the same attention and > protection as other structures in order to protect people? > > How about we just call residences farm buildings and exempt them all together? > > > > > > From: <Designsarasota at aol.com> > Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:43:20 EDT > To: <codetalk at myfloridacode.com> > Subject: [Florida Code Talk] Design by Contractor > > I have done my own drawings on a bunch of homes prior to the housing bust, and > they were all designed by 1099 standards and language. I have not done one > since the codes have changed. Can anyone help me with what the current design > standard and necessary language that is required on the cover page of the > drawings. The project I have coming up is residential and not on a barrier > island, and I want to do Contractor sealed drawings. > Barry Barbas > Barbas Buildings and Designs, Inc. > > > _______________________________________________ > CodeTalk mailing list > CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com > Unsubscribe by sending an email to codetalk-unsubscribe at myfloridacode.com > or > Unsubscribe or change your options at: > http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk _______________________________________________ CodeTalk mailing list CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com Unsubscribe by sending an email to codetalk-unsubscribe at myfloridacode.com or Unsubscribe or change your options at: http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20100414/1bdd66a5/attachment.html -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 58150 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20100414/1bdd66a5/attachment.jpe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: image/jpeg Size: 58150 bytes Desc: not available Url : http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20100414/1bdd66a5/attachment-0001.jpe
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] Design by Contractor
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] Design by Contractor
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list