[Florida Code Talk] Update on the Home Inspection and Mold Regulations
Bob Koning
Bob at ContractorsInstitute.com
Thu Jul 15 18:22:42 EDT 2010
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list
Thu Jul 15 18:22:42 EDT 2010
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] FW: Rule 9B-60
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] Update on the Home Inspection and Mold Regulations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Group, I know it's been awhile since my last update, but we've been busy trying to work things out. Doesn't look good. The department has not included Division 1 contractors as "deemed" to meet the licensure requirements for Home Inspectors, Mold Assessors and Mold Remediators by default. They have not recognized any other entities as approved for licensure certification except the specific ones originally listed that were borne from association memberships (even though they are not Florida specific). There has been no approval for the CI-Certified programs that require Florida Licensure as a prerequisite and then provide Florida specific training and testing through the Association of Construction Industry Certified Professionals (www.acicp.org ). If approval had been given, the Contractors Institute was poised to give all training, testing and certification for Inspection, Assessment and Remediation licensure free to all Division 1 Contractors for the good of the industry and citizens of the Great State of Florida.. I wonder if the cost had been raised to thousands of dollars like the "approved" associations if acceptance would have been granted? Are they associating high membership and training fees with quality certifications? We are now focusing on getting the Construction Industry Licensing Board to write these services into our "authorized scope of services" which would circumvent the law for us - but I am highly doubtful. We have some meetings coming up and I will be presenting a request for the language at the August Board Meeting of the CILB if they will hear me. If not, we will be setting up a trust fund and asking for small donations to initiate a legal challenge. I thousands of us give a few dollars, we can quickly obtain an attorney. I hope we don't need to go to that extreme. Maybe a congressperson will "step-up" to the plate at this point and help us. (I know, I'm dreaming again) Here is a July 15, 2010 email I have sent to the entire congress, and to the key people at the Department of Professional Regulation - feel free to follow up with your representative... ++++++++++++ Messrs., Workman, Fasano, Harrell, Vacarro, Morrision, et. al., The effect of the Home Inspector and Mold legislation is manifesting itself... As I feared it would... We are already being bombarded with the campaign from the American Council for Accredited Certification as to their approval as the "EXCLUSIVE" provider of mold licensure examinations, and how when States use them the "ADVANTAGE" goes to those certified by this so called "Council"? Does it remind you of a "no-bid" governmental contract? Funny how the CI-Certified BCT (Building Contaminant Technician) and the CI-Certified BCA (Building Contaminant Assessor) certifications have not been accepted even though the prerequisites are more strict than the certification agencies approved by rule, even though the CI-Certified training is Florida specific (unlike those approved by rule) and the CI-Certified training requires knowledge of the Florida HVHZ codes (unlike those approved by rule). Odd isn't it? The many hundreds of CI-Certified contractors who have been performing these services without incidence and are now precluded from initial licensure or grandfathering (since we do not practice such services as our sole source of income, rather we perform the services for our clients as needed, therefore some are unable to meet the 40 required assessments or remediation, that is a prerequisite to grandfathering). Not to mention the tens of thousands of other Division 1 Contractors who have been providing these services to the public with confident results and without any memberships or other certifications. They are now barred. Maybe it's because the CI-Certified programs (through the Association of Construction Industry Certified Professionals - www.acicp.org ) does not charge for membership or testing? Not even for membership to its www.floridacode.com and discussion forum. Heaven forbid something is free for a public service. The only charge is for the required training and education; and it's costs are hundreds of dollars rather than many thousands through the private associations sanctified by the department and its new rule. What a shame for the citizens of Florida that the contractors of Florida have been deprived of performing the services that they have been doing since the beginning without any public issues or problems, and that the CITIZENS of the state of Florida will pay MUCH higher premiums for mold assessment and remediation, while receiving REDUCED quality in delivered construction services related to mold assessment and remediation by firms that are not Division 1 Contractors. (the ones that were largely to blame for unscrupulous work practices were unlicensed contractors - they now are the one ones being sanctified and certified by the new requirements). Look at the un-truths or misdirection we as State Licensed Contractors have been endured with this statute and the implementation of its' administrative code to date: 1. Members of the original committee that traveled the state publicly told us an un-truth; that Division 1 Contractors would be able to continue to perform these services in the same manner as before the law - Un-true, we cannot 2. Members of Congress indicated to me that they had included language in the statute that gave the Department of Professional Regulation the ability to "deem" all Division 1 Contractors as meeting the requirements, meaning we would only need to apply and pay the additional licensure fee. Although they did include such language, the Department has subsequently failed to apply it and contend they do not have the authority (or are unwilling to apply the authority) to protect the public and allow Division 1 Contractors as a whole to become licensed without further compliance or alternatively providing an obtainable method of attaining licensure. (Even though they recognize we have been performing these services since the beginning) 3. The Department and other agencies are writing proprietary compliance regulations with associations or "Councils" whose genesis were proprietary associations - they promised they would not do so. And look at the Home Inspector requirements; unless you have performed 120 "Home Inspections" in last 3 years, Division 1 Contractors are unable to grandfather and new Division 1 Contractors will not be eligible for licensure unless they attend a 120 hour training program (an existing program developed by the existing home inspection associations used to train someone with ABSOLUTELY no knowledge of construction - about construction!) and take a proctored exam from a proprietary home inspection testing agency whose genesis is associations . Even the CI-Certified HPI (Home and Property Inspector) designation is not allowed. Even though (as above) it requires a Division 1 Contractor status and SPECIFIC Florida codes and conditions training! And if this were not enough, consider this: 1. Division 1 Contractors have 8000 hours of verified construction experience and have taken a 3 part proctored exam. (now they will need a 120 hour course of the basics; kinda like being sent back to elementary school from college); 2. Division 1 Contractors are required to perform these home inspections pursuant to the Florida Bar and Florida Association of Realtors approved Contract for Sale of Florida Real Estate (contractors were exclusively required with home inspectors listed as additionally approved in later versions) 3. The Florida Wind Mitigation forms specifically require Division1 Contractors perform their home inspections (home inspectors are not approved) 4. Division 1 Contractors are required to coordinate, understand, supervise and be legally responsible for all 8 items listed for home inspection in the statute. 5. Division 1 Contractors must inspect a commercial building or inspect for property code compliance inside or outside the building (a home inspector is not allowed to do so under current statute) 6. Division 1 Contractors are allowed to dismantle and inspect for industry compliance where a home inspector is allowed to perform a "limited site inspection" All of this and now a Division 1 Contractor cannot "limited visually inspect" a residential home and issue a home inspection report? Absurd. We cannot let this continue - I am going to continue attempting to resolve these injustices - If not, we MUST "gather our Armies" and collect enough funds to file the necessary litigation to protect the citizens and contractors of Florida. We will keep you posted through the discussion group at www.myfloridacode.com Robert Koning Director Contractors Institute Director Association of Construction Industry Certified Professionals rjkoning at contractorinstitute.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20100715/83889a8b/attachment.html
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] FW: Rule 9B-60
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] Update on the Home Inspection and Mold Regulations
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list