[Florida Code Talk] CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 30
Mark Cramer
mcramer1 at tampabay.rr.com
Wed Jul 21 11:50:31 EDT 2010
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list
Wed Jul 21 11:50:31 EDT 2010
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 30
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 33
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
I'm not saying you are right or wrong, but do you have a source for that information? This is one of the problems with Wind Mit inspections. There are many questions and no clear answers. It's illogical to think that shingle suddenly changed on March 1, 2002. Shingles manufactured before that date could meet the standard. Mark Cramer Mark Cramer Inspection Services, Inc. 492 20th Ave. Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785 727-595-4211 http://www.BestTampaInspector.com -----Original Message----- From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Jack Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2010 10:52 AM To: codetalk at myfloridacode.com Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 30 My understanding is as follows: If a roof was permitted prior to March 1, 2002, then it is not allowed on mitigation. After March 1, 2002, it is allowed. Above is all counties except HVHZ which is Miami, Dade and Broward. HVHZ is allowed if permitted after 9/1/1994 and not allowed if prior to that date. Your customer was in October of 2001, so you were right not to allow this. If he is in HVHZ, the 1994 date applies. Jack B. Harris Jacbilt Enterprises, Inc. www.jacbilt.com -----Original Message----- From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of codetalk-request at myfloridacode.com Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 7:07 PM To: codetalk at myfloridacode.com Subject: CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 30 Send CodeTalk mailing list submissions to codetalk at myfloridacode.com To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to codetalk-request at myfloridacode.com You can reach the person managing the list at codetalk-owner at myfloridacode.com When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than "Re: Contents of CodeTalk digest..." Today's Topics: 1. Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection (Mark Tyson) 2. FW: Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection (Mark Tyson) 3. Re: Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection (Mark Cramer) ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message: 1 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:24:47 -0400 From: "Mark Tyson" <mtyson at wildblue.net> Subject: [Florida Code Talk] Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection To: <codetalk at myfloridacode.com> Message-ID: <0DC99B8AE1D04DAF952E5CF2EAEF999B at yourf5358a91b8> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Group, I need you insight. Last week I did a wind mit inspection on a home where I was unable to verify thru procedures that I?m aware of that the roof covering met the minimum requirement of the 2001 Building Code. ( 3 tab dimensional Shingles) 1) I did a public records search and found the roof covering was permitted in October of 2001. 2) The AHJ or the owner had no record of manufacturer of the roof covering 3) The attachments penetrated the ?? cdx roof sheathing meeting the minimum penetration requirement but only 4 attachments per shingle 4) No extra shingles at the site and therefore unable to verify manufacture Under does the roof covering meet the requirements of the 2001 Building Code I checked the box unknown or can not verify My client called today in a rage because his insurance is going to increase about $ 1,000 per year and was told by his agent that he picked the wrong inspector. With the information provided have I missed something? Regards, Mark Tyson Tyson Home Inspections M Tyson Construction LLC. of 772.489.9648 mb 561.756.3075 fx 772.465.9731 Certified General Contractor #1516843 http://www.TysonHomeInspections.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20100720/88160b85/at tachment-0001.html ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 18:28:10 -0400 From: "Mark Tyson" <mtyson at wildblue.net> Subject: [Florida Code Talk] FW: Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection To: <codetalk at myfloridacode.com> Message-ID: <83FA75EF190A4570A63AF73D0B67D2FE at yourf5358a91b8> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sorry, 130mph zone Regards, Mark Tyson Tyson Home Inspections M Tyson Construction LLC. of 772.489.9648 mb 561.756.3075 fx 772.465.9731 Certified General Contractor #1516843 http://www.TysonHomeInspections.com _____ From: Mark Tyson [mailto:mtyson at wildblue.net] Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:25 PM To: 'codetalk at myfloridacode.com' Subject: Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection Group, I need you insight. Last week I did a wind mit inspection on a home where I was unable to verify thru procedures that I?m aware of that the roof covering met the minimum requirement of the 2001 Building Code. ( 3 tab dimensional Shingles) 1) I did a public records search and found the roof covering was permitted in October of 2001. 2) The AHJ or the owner had no record of manufacturer of the roof covering 3) The attachments penetrated the ?? cdx roof sheathing meeting the minimum penetration requirement but only 4 attachments per shingle 4) No extra shingles at the site and therefore unable to verify manufacture Under does the roof covering meet the requirements of the 2001 Building Code I checked the box unknown or can not verify My client called today in a rage because his insurance is going to increase about $ 1,000 per year and was told by his agent that he picked the wrong inspector. With the information provided have I missed something? Regards, Mark Tyson Tyson Home Inspections M Tyson Construction LLC. of 772.489.9648 mb 561.756.3075 fx 772.465.9731 Certified General Contractor #1516843 http://www.TysonHomeInspections.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20100720/d7198534/at tachment-0001.html ------------------------------ Message: 3 Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2010 20:06:28 -0400 From: "Mark Cramer" <mcramer1 at tampabay.rr.com> Subject: Re: [Florida Code Talk] Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection To: <codetalk at myfloridacode.com> Message-ID: <01cf01cb2868$910d5130$b327f390$@tampabay.rr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Even though the FBC didn?t go into effect until March of 2002, I?ve heard that shingle manufacturers were already shipping compliant shingles in 2001. I think you would be safe assuming they met the requirements in October 2001. You could always ask the seller to have his roofer provide the documentation that the shingles meet the code requirements. Mark Cramer Mark Cramer Inspection Services, Inc. 492 20th Ave. Indian Rocks Beach, FL 33785 727-595-4211 http://www.BestTampaInspector.com From: codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com [mailto:codetalk-bounces at myfloridacode.com] On Behalf Of Mark Tyson Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 6:25 PM To: codetalk at myfloridacode.com Subject: [Florida Code Talk] Wind Mitigation Verification Inspection Group, I need you insight. Last week I did a wind mit inspection on a home where I was unable to verify thru procedures that I?m aware of that the roof covering met the minimum requirement of the 2001 Building Code. ( 3 tab dimensional Shingles) 1) I did a public records search and found the roof covering was permitted in October of 2001. 2) The AHJ or the owner had no record of manufacturer of the roof covering 3) The attachments penetrated the ?? cdx roof sheathing meeting the minimum penetration requirement but only 4 attachments per shingle 4) No extra shingles at the site and therefore unable to verify manufacture Under does the roof covering meet the requirements of the 2001 Building Code I checked the box unknown or can not verify My client called today in a rage because his insurance is going to increase about $ 1,000 per year and was told by his agent that he picked the wrong inspector. With the information provided have I missed something? Regards, Mark Tyson Tyson Home Inspections M Tyson Construction LLC. of 772.489.9648 mb 561.756.3075 fx 772.465.9731 Certified General Contractor #1516843 http://www.TysonHomeInspections.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://myfloridacode.com/pipermail/codetalk/attachments/20100720/146a7475/at tachment.html ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ CodeTalk mailing list CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk End of CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 30 **************************************** _______________________________________________ CodeTalk mailing list CodeTalk at myfloridacode.com Unsubscribe by sending an email to codetalk-unsubscribe at myfloridacode.com or Unsubscribe or change your options at: http://myfloridacode.com/mailman/listinfo/codetalk
- Previous message: [Florida Code Talk] CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 30
- Next message: [Florida Code Talk] CodeTalk Digest, Vol 59, Issue 33
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the CodeTalk mailing list